10-Step Process

         
UNITED WE STAND

The page you are viewing was Last Updated on:  Sunday, February 27, 2000

Home
Up
Next

Site Index
Recent Updates
Links & Contacts

 

PennDOT's 10-Step Process to Transportation Project Development

The 10-Step Transportation Development Process developed by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation integrates the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Through a series of monthly meetings, transportation projects are developed in cooperation with several state and federal agencies including:
    Federal Highway Administration
    Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
    Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
    US Army Corps of Engineers
    US Environmental Protection Agency
    US Fish and Wildlife Service
    Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
    Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture
    Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission
    Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission
    Pennsylvania Game Commission
The 10-Step Transportation Project Development Process Flow Diagram is a systematic process which ensures that transportation projects are developed in an environmentally-sensitive manner that reflects agency and public input. The steps of the process are outlined below:
Steps 1-3 focus on establishing PROJECT NEED. Information is gathered and an analysis of the need for the project is completed and reviewed with resource agencies and the public.
Step 4 considers a full range of alternatives and establishes the PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVES that will be evaluated in greater detail in Step 5.
Step 5 seeks agreement on DETAILED ALTERNATIVES and is characterized by detailed engineering and environmental analysis of the smaller number of alternatives identified for further development in Step 4. In this step, the alternatives to be evaluated in detail in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement are identified.
Steps 6 & 7 involve preparation of the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS), as well as circulation of the document for agency and public review and the public hearing. During these steps consensus is sought for a PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE.
Step 8 involves the preparation and distribution of the FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS), which documents and addresses comments received from agencies and the public on the DEIS.
Step 9 & 10 include the preparation and issuance of a RECORD OF DECISION (ROD), which documents the final decision on the selected alternative and completion of a MITIGATION REPORT for use in final design and construction of the project. The Mitigation Report outlines the measures which will be taken to lessen impacts of the project.
Planning regulations developed as a result of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) required the completion of two additional studies during Step 4 for the Mon/Fayette Expressway PA-51 to Pittsburgh and the three Southern Beltway Projects. These studies were conducted in cooperation with the Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission (SPRPC), who was a co-lead agency with the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission for the development of the studies. The two studies (whose findings were approved by SPRPC on September 30, 1996) are described below:
Congestion Management System (CMS) Analysis - A study that determines how measures such as transit, car pooling, van pooling, flex-time, intersection improvements and high occupancy vehicle lanes might reduce traffic congestion and reduce or eliminate the need for a new highway as an alternative in the development of the project.
Major Investment Study (MIS) - An analysis which evaluates the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of alternative transportation investments in attaining local, state and national goals and objectives for the metropolitan region. The study utilizes a cooperative process which leads to a decision on the design concept and scope of an investment. It assesses a broad range or alternatives to ensure that the alternatives under consideration are cost effective and will meet the needs of the project area before they are studied in detail. The alternatives which may be evaluated include: new highways, light rail, mass transit improvements, multi-modal facilities and/or upgrading of the existing transportation network.